The EOR vs. PEO Decision: A Checklist for Choosing the Right Solution

Expanding your workforce in the highly competitive business environment of today demands more than just recruiting the most qualified talents. It entails navigating complex employment laws, overseeing HR functions, and ensuring smooth payroll operations.

Businesses looking to streamline these processes have two primary options: Professional Employer Organizations (PEOs) and Employers of Record (EORs). But how do you decide which is best for your company?

PEO and EOR solutions for business

Understanding PEOs and EORs

What is a PEO?

A Professional Employer Organization (PEO) acts as a co-employer, sharing responsibilities with your business for managing employee-related tasks. This includes human resource services, payroll, benefits, and compliance. PEOs are especially useful for small to medium-sized businesses that want to provide competitive benefits without incurring the costs of maintaining a full HR department.

What is an EOR?

An Employer of Record (EOR) enables businesses to hire employees in different regions without establishing a legal entity there. The EOR becomes the legal employer, handling all administrative tasks such as compliance, taxes, and payroll, while the business continues to control day-to-day operations and employee management.

Recruitment process

Comparing PEOs vs EORs

Cost Effectiveness

  • PEOs can provide a substantial return on investment (ROI), with cost savings averaging 27.3%. These savings come from reduced administrative burdens and improved employee benefits. However, to utilize a PEO in a specific country, businesses must establish a local entity, which involves navigating local regulations and labor laws.
  • EORs provide a cost-effective alternative, eliminating the need for a local entity, which can cost between $15,000 and $20,000. Additionally, annual maintenance costs can reach up to $200,000. They allow businesses to hire quickly, reducing overhead costs and saving time.

HR and Payroll Management

  • PEOs provide a comprehensive suite of HR services at a lower cost, such as payroll processing, tax filing, retirement plans, and more. They currently serve 200,000 small and medium-sized businesses, employing approximately 4.5 million people.
  • EORs handle all HR and payroll functions for international hires, ensuring cross-jurisdictional compliance. This makes them ideal for businesses planning global expansion. 

Compliance and Risk Management

  • PEOs assist in meeting domestic legal and regulatory requirements.
  • EORs emphasize compliance with international employment laws, making it an excellent choice for businesses entering new markets.

Employee Benefits and Engagement

  • PEOs allow small businesses to provide competitive benefits comparable to larger corporations, resulting in increased employee satisfaction and lower turnover rates (10-14% lower).
  • EORs manage statutory benefits and minimum requirements in foreign markets, but they may not offer the same level of benefit customization as PEOs.

Business Scalability and Flexibility

  • PEOs help businesses grow by offering scalable HR solutions within their existing operations.
  • EORs provide significant flexibility for global scaling without the need for local entities, which is ideal for companies looking to enter new international markets.

Administrative Burden

  • PEOs share administrative responsibilities, reducing the burden on internal HR teams, but require management’s involvement.
  •  EORs handle the majority of administrative tasks, allowing businesses to focus on core activities without having to worry about local compliance and HR management.

Business people discussing recruitment

Conclusion

Choosing between a PEO and an EOR is largely determined by your company’s goals and operational requirements. If your primary goal is domestic growth and you want to provide comprehensive benefits at a lower cost, a PEO could be the best option.

If you want to expand internationally and need a flexible solution to deal with complex global regulations, an EOR may be more beneficial.