Kurush Mistry Muses on Remote Versus In-Person Trading

Kurush Mistry cover

As the financial world grapples with the rise of remote work, seasoned energy analyst Kurush Mistry makes a compelling case for maintaining physical presence on trading floors, emphasizing the irreplaceable value of face-to-face interactions in developing market expertise.

“A creative environment is one of collaboration and osmosis,” Mistry explains, highlighting how crucial informal interactions are in trading environments. “I would be standing at my desk and I’d hear someone say something three or four desks away, and I’d just catch that. If I was at home, you can have all the Zoom calls you want, but everyone’s going to be on mute and that kind of conversation just isn’t going to happen.”

The Challenge of Building Trust Remotely

Drawing from decades of experience in oil and renewable fuels analysis, Kurush Mistry believes in the importance of physical presence for junior analysts entering the industry. He notes that building initial trust and relationships with experienced traders requires sustained in-person interaction, especially when dealing with senior professionals who might be skeptical of newcomers.

“When someone’s coming in with a little bit of reticence with senior people viewing them as junior and not giving them the time of day, sometimes it’s very hard,” Mistry observes. “I think as organizations and as people who want to grow teams, we should be selfishly motivated to help juniors because we want our teams to grow and our organizations to do well.”

The impact of this philosophy is evident in Mistry’s track record of mentoring success. He proudly points to former mentees who have gone on to become successful traders and analysts at major firms, attributing their growth largely to the opportunities for visibility and hands-on learning that in-person environments provide.

Lessons From the Pandemic

The challenges of remote work became particularly apparent during the COVID-19 pandemic. Even for Kurush Mistry, a veteran in the industry, establishing new team connections proved significantly more difficult without face-to-face interaction. “It was a struggle, even for someone like me who’s been in the industry a long time. I had to put in so much extra effort to make those connections happen virtually that would have come naturally in person.”

This experience was particularly challenging when working with international teams. Mistry notes that in normal circumstances, he’d travel to different offices, spending several days working alongside team members and building relationships through shared experiences both in and out of the office. The pandemic forced a shift to virtual interactions, which he found inadequate for creating the deep connections necessary for effective collaboration.

While acknowledging the benefits of hybrid work models, such as reduced commute times and improved work-life balance, Mistry advocates for maintaining regular in-person touchpoints. He suggests that even if it’s just a couple of days per week or month, physical presence remains essential for maintaining a collaborative spirit and effectively passing knowledge to the next generation of analysts.

“If you’re given a module of code to write and you said, ‘Do this in the best possible way,’ sure, you can possibly do that on your own sitting at home,” Mistry concedes. However, he highlights that the real value of trading floor presence lies in the unplanned interactions and spontaneous learning opportunities that virtual environments cannot replicate.

Trade floor

The Future of Trading Floor Culture

For Kurush Mistry, the value of in-person interaction extends beyond just professional development. He stresses how physical presence enables spontaneous learning opportunities and helps build the kind of trust-based relationships crucial for success in the volatile energy trading markets.

This perspective comes from his experience working across global markets, where understanding local nuances and building strong relationships with colleagues in different locations has been crucial to his success. While technology can facilitate communication, Mistry maintains that there’s no substitute for the kind of deep understanding and trust that comes from working together in person.

“You can’t do that without physical interaction,” Kurush Mistry concludes, suggesting that while remote work has its place, the future of effective trading and analysis will likely require finding the right balance between virtual convenience and in-person collaboration. His insights suggest that maintaining some level of physical presence will remain crucial for developing the next generation of trading talent.